ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Question about Vuescan



On Sun, 28 Oct 2001 12:14:28 +0530, you wrote:

>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Maris V. Lidaka, Sr." <mlidaka@ameritech.net>
>To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
>Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 6:01 AM
>Subject: Re: filmscanners: Question about Vuescan
>
>
>> It's not auto-detect, but it has 16 (more than a "few") Kodak film types,
>and each film type has settings under it for different speed film, etc. in
>the bottom box.
>>
>> Maris
>
>
>Actually, i think, Ken was referring to slide films... he's right on that
>score... There's just an option for Kodak and Generic and under Kodak for
>Ektachrome, Kodachrome, Reversal and RPC Copy Film.


Aha, that explains it.  I wasn't careful enough asking the question.
I can see that there is a lot more range in the negative films, but
still - should Velvia and Provia both be scanned under "Generic?"
Feels strange to me, although I admit that so far I have few
complaints about the results.

Maybe I'll try scanning Velvia under Kodachrome and see how it looks!


Ken




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.