ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Canon 4000 scanner VS Nikon LS4000




>At 9:44 AM -0500 20-11-01, Bruce Kinch wrote:
>>
>>Perhaps it's worth noting that Kodak now provides "curved field" 
>>projection lenses as standard for normal (cardboard, presumably) mounted 
>>slides in their Carousel projectors, but their older "flat field" design 
>>is recommended for glass mounted transparencies.
>
>BF: If memory serves correctly this has been the case at least since the 
>1970's.  Curved field lenses were standard, and flat field lenses were 
>special orders.

YES!  I have wondered why Nikon don't do the same thing within the range of 
their scanner Depth of Field. It would nearly double warping that could be 
tolerated before losing focus. The only downside is that you would have to 
put the film/slide in the "right way round" regarding film curve, not 
regarding mirror image sense.  This would not be a problem if documented 
clearly.

Julian




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.