ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Canon 4000 scanner VS Nikon LS4000 >Mikael



Nikon might be approaching the limits of linearity in the LEDs.  They 
also need to be able to have a range of brightness available to them for 
the "analog exposure" they offer.  Since Blue LEDs are (or at least 
were) the least bright, they might be the limiting factor.

Art

Julian Robinson wrote:

> Mikael - thanks for this useful info.  It is interesting that the 
> different generations of scanners have the same depth of field although 
> they have totally different optics.  Means that Nikon must be holding a 
> firm line against other constraints (such as LED brightness).
> 
> Cheers
> Julian
> 






 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.