Lexa Software: Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk archive

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: Filmscanners

Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Any real 4000x6000 camera back???

To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Any real 4000x6000 camera back???
From: "kmh" <kevin@kmhorton.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2001 14:11:37 -0000
List-help: <mailto:majordomo@lists.cix.co.uk> 'help' as msg. text
Mailing-list: filmscanners; contact: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
References: <CB95A1AEAF62D311A99400508B10DD5309CB1848@emss01m05.ems.lmco.com> <3BFCBD6A.E4E0B054@bway.net>

No, the Kodak back does not use interpolation to achieve 4k x 4k

>>But aren't those really just 4000 x 4000 *sensors* (not pixels), and since
each pixel is made up of an R, G &
B (and usually an extra G) sensor, it would mean that it's really just 1000
x 1000...the rest is
interpolation.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: filmscanners: Any real 4000x6000 camera back???
  - From: SKID Photography <skid@bway.net>
- RE: filmscanners: Any real 4000x6000 camera back???
  - From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>

References:
- RE: filmscanners: Any real 4000x6000 camera back???
  - From: "Shough, Dean" <dean.shough@lmco.com>
- Re: filmscanners: Any real 4000x6000 camera back???
  - From: SKID Photography <skid@bway.net>

Prev by Date: RE: filmscanners: Re: LS8000 Banding Question
Next by Date: RE: filmscanners: Re: LS8000 Banding Question
Previous by thread: RE: filmscanners: Any real 4000x6000 camera back???
Next by thread: RE: filmscanners: Any real 4000x6000 camera back???
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread