ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Any real 4000x6000 camera back???



kmh wrote:

> No, the Kodak back does not use interpolation to achieve 4k x 4k
>
> >>But aren't those really just 4000 x 4000 *sensors* (not pixels), and since
> each pixel is made up of an R, G &
> B (and usually an extra G) sensor, it would mean that it's really just 1000
> x 1000...the rest is
> interpolation.

How can you say that if there is only one sensor per color and a pixel is made 
up of 4 sensors (an extra G).
Beyond Kodak's claims that is.  They cannot pack that many sensors into a 
capture device with current
technology.

Harvey Ferdschneider
partner, SKID Photography, NYC







 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.