ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: PC memory type for filmscanning (OT - slightly)



It is more expensive, but not that much more. I bought 512mb of RDRAM for
$160.

Tom
-----

> Is RDRAM a better choice for systems used for scanning and
> processing large 2d image files?

The PC mags report recently (maybe Nov-Dec) that RDRAM is only a few
percent faster than DDR.  It's no surprise that Dell got off the RDRAM
wagon.
RDRAM is much, much more expensive than DDR.  A gig of DDR will
work wonders for your constitution.

>
>
> Does anyone have any suggestions for www sites that discuss
> this issue?
>
> Thanks and happy new year,
> JimD
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ------------
> Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe' in
the
> title or body
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe' in the
title or body



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe' in the 
title or body




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.