ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: PC memory type for filmscanning (OT - slightly)




--- Tom Scales <tscales@attglobal.net> wrote:
> It is more expensive, but not that much more. I bought 512mb of RDRAM
> for
> $160.

That's about twice as expensive as DDR2100. For only a minimal
improvement I would say RDRAM is really expensive. For that money I can
get a faster HD or more memory which quite likely will give a better
performance improvement then the RDRAM.

Robert

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe' in the 
title or body




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.