[filmscanners] Re: LS4000 vs IV ED

["Arthur Entlich" <artistic@ampsc.com>]

OK, so the larger images are all single pass (I missed the slide versus
image settings on the Vuescan)

In Netscape with my system, the mouse pointer/cursor doesn't show
anything.  I ended up using properties to read the name of the jpeg file.

Anyway, doesn't look like multipass in these cases makes a big difference.

Art

Jawed Ashraf wrote:

> Sounds like you whizzed through too quickly.  The top image uses *SLIDE*
> scanning in Vuescan, the middle image uses *IMAGE* scanning in Vuescan and
> the bottom one is Nikon Scan.
>
> For the crops the mouse pointer is captioned.  Plus, they are described in
> more detail in the "How the results are presented" section:
>
> http://www.cupidity.force9.co.uk/Scanners/LS40/how_the_tests_were_done.htm
>
> (scroll down to the bottom)
>
> So, yes, in the three crops, the middle one is multipass.
>
> Jawed
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
>>[mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
>>Sent: 11 January 2002 03:28
>>To: Jawed@cupidity.force9.co.uk
>>Subject: [filmscanners] Re: LS4000 vs IV ED
>>
>>
>>I took a look at the website and the Astia samples.  You need to fix the
>>titles under the samples, they are either missing (in the cropped images
>>once they appear) or in the case of the full images, the top two are
>>listed as Vuescan Single pass, and the bottom one as Nikoscan.  I
>>suspect the middle image is a multipass scan??
>>
>>Didn't check the other film types.
>>
>>Art
>>
>>
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body