ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Scanning chromogenic



On Fri, 1 Feb 2002 10:25:15 +0100   Alessandro Pardi
(alessandro.pardi@inferentiadnm.com) wrote:

> I understand that keeping also R and B channels should
> somehow "average out" grain, but I'm also sure this will increase noise
> (especially from the blue channel) so much that I doubt it will give
> better
> scans. Anyway, I'll give this a try and see what happens...

Using all 3 channels averages aliasing errors, which is why grain seems
less pronounced. Noise could be a problem on some scanners, as you say, but
you could mask it off on the offending channel.

Regards

Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info
& comparisons
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.