ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Scanning chromogenic (for Ed Hamrick)



Ed, 
scan guru,
I summon thee. 

I know you must be very busy with release 7.5, but may I ask you (or anybody
else that happens to know the answer) what channels do you get pixels from
when media type is set to BW negative?

Thanks, 
Alessandro Pardi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: TonySleep@halftone.co.uk [mailto:TonySleep@halftone.co.uk]
> Sent: venerdì 1 febbraio 2002 15.36
> To: alessandro.pardi@inferentiadnm.com
> Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Scanning chromogenic
> 
> 
> On Fri, 01 Feb 2002 02:42:26 -0800  Arthur Entlich 
> (artistic-1@shaw.ca)
> wrote:
> 
> >  I haven't made a test of the two methods, but from what I can
> > gather, either way the information is the same, in terms of 
> the source
> > material.
> 
> I have. The difference is quite substantial. Going from RGB->greyscale
> gives smoother tones than scanning in greyscale.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Tony Sleep
> http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + 
> film scanner info
> & comparisons
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------
> Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 
> 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
> or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the 
> message title or body
> 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.