ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: LS 2000 running slow



Gregg,

I'm using a 2000 on a B&W 350 with a SCSI card and my times are under
2 minutes. Yes, the bottleneck is USB. It is much slower than SCSI.
You can pick up an Adaptec 2930U PCI SCSI card for around $60 and
others for under $100. Check the specs to make sure they have or will
have OS X drivers available.

Bill

>  >I just purchased a used LS 2000.  I scanned at 2700dpi, 12 bit, multi
>>sample, with no corrections or Ice and my scan time was about 23 minutes
>>using Nikon v3.1.2.   I have a G4 450 dual and am using a usb converter for
>>the SCSI connection with the scanner, I'm assuming that is the bottle neck
>>(could usb be that slow?).  What are real world scan times for 35mm slides?
>>with or without SCSI and or ICE? Any other helpful hits would be
>>appreciated.
>>
>>Thanks,
>  >Gregg

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.