ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000




Arthur Entlich wrote:

In my haste, I made a few errors which made reading this difficult:

It should read:

 > If you can get a SS4000 for a good price, I would grab it.  It was,
 > and is, a great scanner.  Both units are supported by Silverfast,
 > both units can use the full features of Insight.
 >
 > The person who will best benefit from the new features of the SS4000+
 > versus the SS4000 are:
 >
 > 1) if you can use Firewire, (Mac or Windows beyond 98SE) you get a
 > faster scan.
 >
 > 2) if you shoot or have a lot of Kodachrome or very dense films were
 > even low shadow noise would harm the resultant image.
 >
 > 3) If you have a very dusty environment and are too lazy to run the
 > brush through once a week.
 >
 > 4) If you have no access to the SS4000 (for a price of below $800 to
 > 900) you should consider the SS4000+.  I suspect they are few and far
 > between)  I've seen a few on ebay used,
 > and they sell for more than the clearance prices (which were about
 > $550 US), typically.  My experience is not too many people are
 > selling their SS4000 scanners regardless of when they bought them.
 >
 > Art
  >


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.