[filmscanners] RE: Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000

["Jack Phipps" <JPhipps@asf.com>]

Look inside the scanner.

Jack

-----Original Message-----
From: Austin Franklin [mailto:darkroom@ix.netcom.com]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 4:18 PM
To: Jack Phipps
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000


Jack,

LEDs are considered a diffuse light source, as opposed to a point light
source?

Austin


> Actually, the Nikon 8000 has a diffuse light source.
>
> Jack Phipps
> Applied Science Fiction
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Austin Franklin [mailto:darkroom@ix.netcom.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 4:14 AM
> To: Jack Phipps
> Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Nikon LS-40 vs Polaroid SS4000
>
>
>
> > Yes, I have found the above to be true.  While I was testing a
> > Nikon 8000ED,
> > I was totally blown away by how superb ICE worked with that scanner! I
> > currently have the Minolta Scan Multi Pro on which ICE does a
> much poorer
> > job!
>
> But the Nikon "has" to have ICE to be competitive, as the light source
> exacerbates scratches that would not even appear on a non-LED
> (diffuse light
> source) scanner...
>
> Austin

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body