A reminder, RoC stands for 'restoration of color' on faded old media. Gem
is the one that is supposed to reduce the apparent grain. ICE is strictly
to remove dirt and scratches, and any other surface blemishes.
To my experience, Ed's roc is effective on slides, but 'Faded Negatives' is
vastly better with negatives, providing remarkably accurate colors on old
and faded negatives.
At 10:58 PM 04/02/2002 +0200, you wrote:
>Anthony Atkielski wrote:
>
> > Note that ICE removes dust and scratches; it has no nominal effect on
> grain.
> > I believe ROC or GEM (on the 8000ED) is supposed to reduce grain.
>
>Hi, Anthony,
>
>ICE may not be *supposed* to remove grain but the Vuescan implementation
>sure does. My first attempts with Fuji Superia 100 negatives in a Nikon
>LS-40 had sufficient dust and grain removal at ICE "light", GEM "medium"
>but even better so, dust and grain removal alike, with ICE "medium" and
>GEM "light". ICE "light" and GEM "light" left the negative scans both
>heavier grained and speckled (though this setting - "light" for both -
>is the perfect combo for my Kodak Elitechrome 100 slides).
>
>Greets -
>
>Ralf
>
>--
>My animal photo page on the WWW:
>Find my PGP keys (RSA and DSS/DH) on PGP key servers
>(use "TrustCenter" certified keys only)
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
>filmscanners'
>or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
>or body
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
