Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] Re: Scanning negs vs. slides
- To: lexa@lexa.ru
- Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Scanning negs vs. slides
- From: "david soderman" <scapes@wi.net>
- Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 19:55:59 -0500
- Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk
Tony Atkielski:
> David writes:
Me:
>> This is a "blanket statement" if ever
>> I saw one. I never did like "blanket
>> statements".
Tony Atkielski:
> Very well: All the Portra films I've scanned--800, 400, and 160--have been
> a dream to scan.
Me:
>> I grant that the above may very well be
>> true with your Nikon unit. However,
>> you may wish to revisit my web pages
>> that dealt with this matter.
Tony Atkielski:
> Sorry ... I never did like "web pages that dealt with this matter."
Me:
>> Of all the above scanners, the Nikon was
>> the only one that was able to deliver a
>> pleasing scan (without grain/noise) using Portra.
Tony Atkielski:
> Well, I'm using a Nikon scanner, so that's all that matters to me.
Atta Boy, lil' Tony! If you don't have anything intelligent or helpful to
say, just impersonate an anal adolescent!
Joyfully, -david soderman- <><
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
> or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|