ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Scanning negs vs. slides



David writes:

> This is a "blanket statement" if ever
> I saw one.  I never did like "blanket
> statements".

Very well:  All the Portra films I've scanned--800, 400, and 160--have been
a dream to scan.

> I grant that the above may very well be
> true with your Nikon unit.  However,
> you may wish to revisit my web pages
> that dealt with this matter.

Sorry ... I never did like "web pages that dealt with this matter."

> Of all the above scanners, the Nikon was
> the only one that was able to deliver a
> pleasing scan (without grain/noise) using Portra.

Well, I'm using a Nikon scanner, so that's all that matters to me.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.