ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Scanning negs vs. slides



On 4/16/02 10:02 AM, "david/lisa soderman" <scapes@wi.net> wrote:

> I grant that the above may very well be true with your Nikon unit.  However,
> you may wish to revisit my web pages that dealt with this matter.


My experience scanning Portra NC 400 and 160 on my drum scanner is similar
to Tony.  Compared to NPH it is wonderful for the things I use it for.  That
being said, I get great results from proviaF and velvia in the chrome world
as well...

Lawrence

----------------------------------
Lawrence W. Smith Photography
http://www.lwsphoto.com
lsmith@lwsphoto.com
----------------------------------


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.