ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Scanning negs vs. slides


  • To: lexa@lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Scanning negs vs. slides
  • From: "david soderman" <scapes@wi.net>
  • Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 20:43:49 -0500
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

Lawrence Smith wrote:
> My experience scanning Portra NC 400 and 160 on my drum scanner is similar
> to Tony.

I'm sure that Nikon would be delighted to hear this.  It would reinforce
their "Nikon has drum scanner quality" public image.  ;-)

Joyfully,  -david soderman- <><

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.