[filmscanners] RE: Re:Digital ICE

["Jack Phipps" <JPhipps@asf.com>]

There are differences in how each manufacturer implements Digital ICE. There
are differences in the frequency of the IR, the source of IR, how the lens
handles IR focus and other variables. That said, there usually isn't a lot
of difference between scanner models, but there are some differences. The
higher resolution will identify more surface defects, but I would expect the
newer Minolta would out perform the older Nikon. There are many variables in
the comparison, and without seeing them it is hard to comment further.

Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction



-----Original Message-----
From: Op's [mailto:martin@wollongong.apana.org.au]
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 10:21 PM
To: Jack Phipps
Subject: [filmscanners] Re:Digital ICE



I have "graduated" from a Nikon LS2000 to a Minolta Multi Scan Pro.

I now find that digital Ice does not work as well with the Minolta.  Is this
because of the
higher resolution showing up more detail  - scratches and muck
.
Or is this because its not as good as within the Nikon software?

Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body