[filmscanners] Re: Re:Digital ICE

["Op's" <martin@wollongong.apana.org.au>]

Thanks Jack

Its most likely the higher resolution that's the problem in seeing more 
defects. I have
become more dependent on Ice.

Love that Healing Tool in PS7 tho.

Rob

Jack Phipps wrote:

> There are differences in how each manufacturer implements Digital ICE. There
> are differences in the frequency of the IR, the source of IR, how the lens
> handles IR focus and other variables. That said, there usually isn't a lot
> of difference between scanner models, but there are some differences. The
> higher resolution will identify more surface defects, but I would expect the
> newer Minolta would out perform the older Nikon. There are many variables in
> the comparison, and without seeing them it is hard to comment further.
>
> Jack Phipps
> Applied Science Fiction
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Op's [mailto:martin@wollongong.apana.org.au]
> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 10:21 PM
> To: Jack Phipps
> Subject: [filmscanners] Re:Digital ICE
>
> I have "graduated" from a Nikon LS2000 to a Minolta Multi Scan Pro.
>
> I now find that digital Ice does not work as well with the Minolta.  Is this
> because of the
> higher resolution showing up more detail  - scratches and muck
> .
> Or is this because its not as good as within the Nikon software?
>
> Rob
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------
> Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
> filmscanners'
> or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
> or body
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body