ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Epson Printing Post Scanning...continued


  • To: lexa@lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Epson Printing Post Scanning...continued
  • From: "" <HMSDOC@aol.com>
  • Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 13:41:15 EDT
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk


<< As Kennedy has discussed, grain aliasing is also reduced if the correct
 use of optical filtering occurs, which in this case would be slight
 defocusing.  Have you attempted very slightly defocusing the original
 scan and then using unsharp masking to recover the focus of the correct
 frequency ranges, as he suggested? >>


Will have to see if I can figure out how to do this with the FS4000 and
Filmget or Vuescan.

By the way, if there are any other FS4000 users out there, the newest version
of Filmget (1.0.3) is a definite improvement in terms of color renedition
compared to older versions.  It is worth downloading.

Howard

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.