Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] RE: Slide flatness
- To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
- Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Slide flatness
- From: "Kapetanakis, Constantine" <KAPETAC@polaroid.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 08:04:28 -0400
- Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk
The polaroid ss4000 and ss4000+ will have no problem handling your slides. I
've heard the Nikon depth of field is not that good.
-----Original Message-----
From: al@greenspace.freeserve.co.uk [mailto:al@greenspace.freeserve.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 6:06 PM
To: KAPETAC@polaroid.com
Subject: [filmscanners] Slide flatness
Most of my slides have been through a projector and have "popped" in the
process. I
assume that they never go back quite as flat. Is this right?
I'm still toying with getting a Coolscan 4000 and I wonder whether this
might take the
plane of the film outside the DOF of the scanner. Anyone had any experience
of whether
there is a difference in scanning slides before and after projection?
I guess the ideal workflow would be to scan newly processed slides before
projection (or
glass-mount them which I'd rather not do).
Al Bond
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|