David
I disabled the use of existing thumbnails as you suggested and found that
the large file took 59 seconds to be indexed. Thanks again for the tip.
I'm also finding the program to be very buggy. It freezes pretty regularly
when I try various actions. Time to look on to something else, I think
Brad
On 7/16/02 3:28 AM, "David Townend" <d.townend@ntlworld.com> wrote:
> Hi Brad,
> I'm using iView. On the speed test you conducted on iView if you didn't have
> "ignore built in thumbnails" ticked (Edit>Import Options>On Import>Ignore
> built in thumbnails - ticked) iView will indeed use thumbnails existing in
> the files you are importing, rather than build its own (which are far
> superior). But this takes more time.
> Regards, David
> --
> You can view David's on-line folio at
> and also the results of a recent job at
>
> T - 00 44 (0)20 8374 6289
> M - 00 44 (0)7770 622144
>
>> From: "Brad Smith" <bms0345@pacbell.net>
>> Reply-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>> Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 15:49:55 -0700
>> To: d.townend@ntlworld.com
>> Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Macintosh Image Archiving/Indexing Software
>>
>> I'm GUESSING that the 4 and 6 second results for adding the 10 large images
>> somehow grabbed existing thumbnails while the approx 40 second ones "built"
>> their own. So I don't know that the test is meaningful. Opinions??
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
