[filmscanners] Re: Disabling right-click, etc. (was: Web home page writing software)

["Preben S. Kristensen" <krille@tin.it>]

Anthony (...and Shunith)

I would be interested in knowing which photos ARE worth protecting.?

As far as I know, in the finest museums of the world (for what it is worth),
you may stumble across (quote) sunsets, breaking waves, distant mountains,
nudes (unquote) .

Should we perhaps leave it to the *eyes of the beholder*, instead of
stooping to sweeping generalisations.

All copyrighted material deserves protection against commercial pirating if
the originator so wishes...

Preben


----- Original Message -----
From: "Shunith Dutt" <shunith@vsnl.com>)


Right on!

----- Original Message -----
From: "Anthony Atkielski" <anthony@atkielski.com>

Shunith writes:

> Disabling right click will not stop any of
> the ones you mention from using your pix
> if they so choose.

>I know.  I don't disable anything.

>Furthermore, it seems a bit egotistical to me when photographers go to
extreme lengths (downloadable ActiveX controls and plug-ins, etc.) to
prevent people from stealing their work.  Has it occurred to them that their
might not be worth stealing in the first place?  There are plenty of cats,
dogs, sunsets, breaking waves, distant mountains, nudes, and touristy photos
in the world; most are not worth protecting, since they are a dime a dozen
anyway.<


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body