ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: IV ED dynamic range



Thanks for suggestion, but first of all I don't use Vuescan (tried it a
while ago, didn't like neither the result nor the interface).
Besides of that, I doubt there might be really discernable difference in
this manner between the IV ED and LS4000. Running both at 8 bit mode
(regular scan, no multisampling) both should produce similar results (I
don't think resolution differences can do something in regard of dynamic
range).
Am I wrong ?

Regards,
Alex Z

-----Original Message-----
From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Charlie
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 3:37 PM
To: alexz@zoran.co.il
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: IV ED dynamic range


Alex Zabrovsky wrote:
>
> Hi.
> Yesterday I scanned a few night scenic slides and was again a bit
> disappointed by insufficient dynamic range delivered by my IV ED. The
> original clearly shows fine details in shadows and even in dark areas
whilst
> the scan rendered this areas as almost black.
> Frankly, raising Analog Gain help somewhat revealing considerably more,
but
> then as you obviously realize there is impact on highlights.
> Although the manufacturer claims dynamic range to be about 3.6 (seems to
be
> derived just from 12 bit color resolution), but in practice I suspect it
> barely reaches 3.0-3.2.
>
> Photoshop Levels and sometimes Curves manipulation reveal much more
details
> in most cases which tells that that technically, the scanner is capable to
> perform better (since these details where there although being hidden in
> straight scan)
>
> I still hope I do something wrong and didn't get the most out of my IV ED
> (well I very seldom use 12 bit scanning, perhaps this is a problem ?)
>
> Regards,
> Alex Z
>

I've found it possible to improve the shadow details slightly by
multipass scanning the slide (using Vuescan). I doubt that it will
approach the results of an LS 4000, but I think you can easily see an
improvement.
--
Charlie Hoffpauir
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~charlieh/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.