ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: PS sharpening



>Well, if the G450 works this way, I assume my G550 would do the same, right
>?
>So does that mean that the image itself is 24 color in PS while the 32 are
>only relevant for monitor's appearance ?
>
>Regards,
>Alex Z

I'd say it is only relevant for the display adapter's performance.

As I understand it, 32 vs 24 doesn't affect the monitor's appearance, 
color-wise.  Rather display adapter operations on pixel data can be performed 
much faster with each pixel stored as a 32-bit word instead of parsing 24-bit 
strings into 32-bit HW.  Perhaps someone who is more familiar with this systems 
hardware area can better describe it.

--
Bob Shomler
http://www.shomler.com/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.