ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Grain aliasing: Thoughts, solutions?



On Fri, 11 Oct 2002 19:28:39 -0700  George Hartzell
(hartzell@kestrel.alerce.com) wrote:

> I think that it can make a big difference between whether you degrade
> the frequency of the image before/while it's scanned (e.g. defocusing
> the scanner) or whether you try to blur in photoshop.
>
> When you do it as part of the scan, you just have to throw away enough
> information to get within the Nyquist limit.

Yes, I agree. Trying to deal with an aliased scan is far worse: the errors
are 0.5x the frequency of the optical signal which caused them,so much
larger. Moreover colour aliasing has introduced a whole new class of
problems which simply don't exist if you defocus/filter the optical image
upstream.

Regards

Tony Sleep - http://www.halftone.co.uk
Online portfolio & exhibit + film scanner info & comparisons
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.