ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Heidelberg Topaz


  • To: lexa@lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] Heidelberg Topaz
  • From: "Brock Nanson" <brock@nanson.org>
  • Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 20:00:29 -0800
  • References: <E18Qd1m-0002Mp-00@nanson-mail>
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

> Topic: [filmscanners] Heidelberg Topaz
> =================================
> Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 22:09:36 -0700
> From: Tim Atherton <tim@KairosPhoto.com>
> ----------------------------------------
> Our local printers/designers uses one and it does a nice job - but doesn't
> it weigh about 300lbs...?

330 I believe... what's your point?   ;-))

> Would be nice for 8x10

Yeah, I think it would.  Even for 4x5 I can see the ability to do some
really decent giclee prints from this sort of resolution.  I would really
like to be able to justify snagging it, but I need to know that I can make
it work without a second mortgage!

Brock

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.