Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] RE: [filmscanners_Digest] filmscanners Digest forFri 17 Jan, 2003
- To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
- Subject: [filmscanners] RE: [filmscanners_Digest] filmscanners Digest forFri 17 Jan, 2003
- From: "Austin Franklin" <austin@darkroom.com>
- Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 09:13:39 -0500
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <3E2A7AB8.8000607@shaw.ca>
- Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk
Hi Arthur,
> Rather than canned "air" which is really a propellant which can spit out
> liquid on your film,
Just as a note, I have not had that problem as long as I don▓t use too much
at one time (short bursts), and as long as the can is held upright.
> (and besides its bad for the environment (including
> your own personal one)
I thought it was more so those that used CFC based propellants that were
(really) ⌠bad for the environment■, and that the ⌠CFC Free■ ones were not
near as ⌠bad■. The one I use has difluoroethane, and states ⌠%100 safe for
the ozone■. I did a web search on it, and I wasn▓t able to turn up anything
substantive with a quick glance. Do you have more information on this?
Austin
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|