ПРОЕКТЫ 


  АРХИВ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  СТАТЬИ 


  ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ 


  ПРОГРАММЫ 



ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА












     АРХИВ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: [filmscanners_Digest] filmscanners Digest forFri 17 Jan, 2003


  • To: lexa@www.lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] RE: [filmscanners_Digest] filmscanners Digest forFri 17 Jan, 2003
  • From: "Austin Franklin" <austin@darkroom.com>
  • Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 09:13:39 -0500
  • Importance: Normal
  • In-reply-to: <3E2A7AB8.8000607@shaw.ca>
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

Hi Arthur,

> Rather than canned "air" which is really a propellant which can spit out
> liquid on your film,

Just as a note, I have not had that problem as long as I don▓t use too much
at one time (short bursts), and as long as the can is held upright.

> (and besides its bad for the environment (including
> your own personal one)

I thought it was more so those that used CFC based propellants that were
(really) ⌠bad for the environment■, and that the ⌠CFC Free■ ones were not
near as ⌠bad■.  The one I use has difluoroethane, and states ⌠%100 safe for
the ozone■.  I did a web search on it, and I wasn▓t able to turn up anything
substantive with a quick glance.  Do you have more information on this?

Austin

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.