[filmscanners] RE: [filmscanners_Digest] filmscanners DigestforFri 17 Jan, 2003

["Frank Paris" <frankparis@comcast.net>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk] On Behalf Of
> Austin Franklin
> Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 6:14 AM
> To: frankparis@comcast.net
> Subject: [filmscanners] RE: [filmscanners_Digest]
> filmscanners Digest forFri 17 Jan, 2003
>
>
> Hi Arthur,
> > (and besides its bad for the environment (including
> > your own personal one)
>
> I thought it was more so those that used CFC based
> propellants that were
> (really) "bad for the environment", and that the "CFC Free"
> ones were not near as "bad".  The one I use has
> difluoroethane, and states "%100 safe for the ozone".  I did
> a web search on it, and I wasn't able to turn up anything
> substantive with a quick glance.  Do you have more
> information on this?

You should be able to obtain more information on difluoroethane from the
writing on the can. This is what is on mine: "Do not deliberately
concentrate and/or inhale this product. You could instantly die, suffer
brain damage, or other dangerous and permanent health effects." But I've
been "using as directed," and I'm still alive and kicking.

Frank Paris
frankparis@comcast.net




----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body