ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: DSLRs, film scans and color (was: is this about as good asitgets?)



Bob writes ...

> How does one define "accurate?"  DSLRs can yield good color.
> ...

  In the context of scanning film versus DSLRs, you need to define the
acquired color additionally with respect to "gamut".  That is, you may be
getting accurate color, but are you acquiring ^all^ the colors.  You could
use the anology, sRGB versus AdobeRGB ... that is, both are capable of
delivering accurate color, but AdobeRGB is capable of more colors.

  It is said that film has a much larger gamut of accurate color than does
any DSLR ... but it begs the question, can this larger gamut be scanned, not
only "accurately", but also completely?

cheerios ... shAf  :o)
Avalon Peninsula, Newfoundland
www.micro-investigations.com (in progress)


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.