Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] Re: color negative/print film advice
Thanks again, Doug; I think I understand the distinction.
Sam
>On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 06:36:46 -0700, Sam A. McCandless wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Doug for your Kodak ratings. I'm glad to have your report and
> > looking forward to hearing what you think of the new HD 400 after
> > you've scanned it. I'm hoping it will be a superior to Supra 400 so I
> > can at least be sure of an improvement at ISO 400.
>
>Just to make sure I'm being clear here, those ratings were for the
>results of scanning. For looking at through a loupe or doing analog
>prints, I think the Royal Golds are best with Portra NC a close second,
>then Supra, then Gold Max. But the fact that I'm getting better
>scanned results with Gold Max makes things cheaper for me. :-)
>
>TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
