[filmscanners] Re: Checking and the new Minolta 5400filmscanner

["Alex Z" <alexzfoto@yahoo.com>]

I did quite an extensive comparison of NeatImage vs GEM at all settings
of my LS40 - NeatImage won (though by small margin) - with very simple
setup per image it produced slightly better resolution-wise image with
grain slightly better resolved. Since then I stopped to use GEM until
in hurry and run all the image I scan though NI for grain reduciton.

Alex
--- Petru Lauric <petru.lauric@rcn.com> wrote:
> Simon Lamb wrote:
>
> >A shame Bart didn't provide an insight into using the built in
> diffuser on
> >the scans of the child rather than showing us how poorly Neatimage
> gets rid
> >of grain and softens the image.
> >
> Really? Is NeatImage so poor? [asked Petru who just spent $75 for
> NeatImage two days ago :) ]
>
>
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
> filmscanners'
> or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message
> title or body


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body