Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] Re: Checking and the new Minolta 5400filmscanner
----- Original Message -----
From: "Petru Lauric" <petru.lauric@rcn.com>
To: <simon@sclamb.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:32 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Checking and the new Minolta 5400filmscanner
Simon Lamb wrote:
>A shame Bart didn't provide an insight into using the built in diffuser on
>the scans of the child rather than showing us how poorly Neat Image gets
rid
>of grain and softens the image.
>
Really? Is Neat Image so poor? [asked Petru who just spent $75 for
NeatImage two days ago :) ]
No, Neatimage when used well is very good, as is Grain Surgery which I
personally use. However, the example posted of Neatimage was not good at
all and softened the image. I should have said '.....how poorly Neat Image
got rid of grain....'.
My main point was that it would have been useful to see how the diffuser
would have done.
Simon
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
