Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] NeatImage: (Was Checking and the new Minolta 5400filmscanner)
- To: lexa@lexa.ru
- Subject: [filmscanners] NeatImage: (Was Checking and the new Minolta 5400filmscanner)
- From: "Les Berkley" <wogears@fast.net>
- Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 07:48:51 -0400
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <3F31116E.9080707@rcn.com>
- Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk
> Simon Lamb wrote:
>
> >A shame Bart didn't provide an insight into using the built
> in diffuser
> >on the scans of the child rather than showing us how poorly
> Neatimage
> >gets rid of grain and softens the image.
> >
> Really? Is NeatImage so poor? [asked Petru who just spent $75
> for NeatImage two days ago :) ]
On the RIGHT file, NeatImage is wonderful. On many files it is quite
helpful and well worth using. On some files (lots of fine detail) it
must be used with EXTREME care. There is a significant learning curve
with this app, and a moderately complete knowledge of its parameters,
sliders, etc. is necessary to achieve the best results. That said, it is
well worth the money if you take the time to learn it.
Les
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
