ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Genuine fractals?????



Anybody using Genuine Fractals as a way to up sample images?   My scanner
provides very high resolution compared to my (current) digital camera, but
there are times when I have taken an image with the digital camera that I
would like to enlarge.  I've had some success with Photoshop's BiCubic - it
depends on the image - but I've wondered about Genuine Fractals.

I know the theory, and it makes a lot of sense to me, but my experience is
that there is often some distance between theory and implementation.

So, has anyone used Genuine Fractals as a primary means of up sampling to
allow much larger prints than logically should be done from an original like
a 1.5 MegPixel jpeg (down from a 5 Megpixel digital photograph)?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.