Lexa Software: Nginx-ru@sysoev.ru archive

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: nginx-ru

Nginx-ru mailing list archive (nginx-ru@sysoev.ru)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IBM WAS Web server plug-in - заменить н а nginx?

To: nginx-ru@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: IBM WAS Web server plug-in - заменить н а nginx?
From: "Mykola S. Grechukh" <nick.grechukh@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 11:29:26 +0300
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LFcrbA0MwhUW8AyHL3PyEd/Bss+rXLo5cXnrbxbEpLc=; b=cuU7DcNQcXON8MVTIgArOznrzl+g6r3/1rWpNhT3L9WHJyO4/h9I+C+oyVxzKDLLPM X8sIVoqR5+BY3fRihABL371Kus7iwIe1sy7Y/rtAnnqVizk2jeKIeYv6d8P+WdOG6Tkn 4KMTxQxPvYk9DAhUW8uPEkmWRgauNpUKI6H/A=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ouOcYBgmSYdIehao5rJnMVcOix1EeXWmuLxISNGhmPo8NqIsQUzwfXCuSy41uHDQwN /plJSksUGrOeZQIFDil/S8hTpe81m03frNnKheDEwplIniC4RXrWtRPS/X5GjF7PQ858 +7stesI22X6cnahcC8n5hhZpzqkivw9Eziehg=
In-reply-to: <8f7d0ce10907220109r625985b6ie7c056f6ab82e0ba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <8f7d0ce10907210640y6a6d33c1o7bea86f7d13b18bb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A65DBD3.6060000@xxxxxxx> <8f7d0ce10907210956r4e1359e0w6b54ad92b8e27492@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2d8fb9950907211023m5a150471i4b85e74039f500c2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <8f7d0ce10907211058y2f63ebbbp773180be15fbce1a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2d8fb9950907211451n5d0c9f39r504e0a3f51d364b7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <8f7d0ce10907212031r3048cc36jd1c92f6acd7d9591@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <a4ab440f0907220101o103a7accp871df0ad91b1c7a0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <8f7d0ce10907220109r625985b6ie7c056f6ab82e0ba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Такой вариант тоже рассматривался, но все же добавление 4-го звена уж никак
> не увеличит надежность системы, скорее наоборот - создаст дополнительную
> точку отказа.

можно поставить четыре нгинкса, а между ними балансировать альтеоном :)

References:
- IBM WAS Web server plug-in - заменить на n ginx?
  - From: Бондарец Иван
- Re: IBM WAS Web server plug-in - заменить на nginx?
  - From: Kostya Alexandrov
- Re: IBM WAS Web server plug-in - заменить н а nginx?
  - From: Бондарец Иван
- Re: IBM WAS Web server plug-in - заменить н а nginx?
  - From: Sergey Shepelev
- Re: IBM WAS Web server plug-in - заменить н а nginx?
  - From: Бондарец Иван
- Re: IBM WAS Web server plug-in - заменить н а nginx?
  - From: Sergey Shepelev
- Re: IBM WAS Web server plug-in - заменить н а nginx?
  - From: Бондарец Иван
- Re: IBM WAS Web server plug-in - заменить н а nginx?
  - From: Mykola S. Grechukh
- Re: IBM WAS Web server plug-in - заменить н а nginx?
  - From: Бондарец Иван

Prev by Date: Re: Повторное использо вание map при изменении исходной переменной
Next by Date: Re: IBM WAS Web server plug-in - заменить на nginx?
Previous by thread: Re: IBM WAS Web server plug-in - заменить н а nginx?
Next by thread: Re: IBM WAS Web server plug-in - заменить н а nginx?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread