ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Correct/best methods of scanning



Roger,

> Some friends say that scanning must be done to the exact final size,
> because every resampling is destructive.

It is true that every resampling is destructive...but it is NOT true that
you must scan to the exact final size.  Where the downsampling happens it
still only happens once.

> I have carried out several simple on-screen tests with my LS4000 and
> couldn't really tell a difference, but again this might be tested on large
> printed copies. Any thoughts from the real experts here?

Well, the REAL expert here is YOU!  You need to test out the different
methods you know of, and see what works best for YOUR tools and skill.

Regards,

Austin

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.