[filmscanners] RE: Any advancement on the Microtek 4000T (SS4000)

["Steven Kefford" <Steven.Kefford@Parsec.co.uk>]

There is the Microtek ArtixScan 4000tf, and the Nikon 4000. I am considering
getting one of these, and I would hope that they can both get more shadow
detail than the 4000t. I am not sure that the Canon is as good as the two
above.

Steve

> -----Original Message-----
> From: anthony@ohalloran.co.uk [mailto:anthony@ohalloran.co.uk]
> Sent: 09 December 2002 15:07
> To: Steven.Kefford@Parsec.co.uk
> Subject: [filmscanners] Any advancement on the Microtek 4000T (SS4000)
>
>
>
> Hi
>
> I've been generally happy with my Microtek 4000T over the past 1.5
> years. The one thing that I find unacceptable is it's inability to get
> good detail out of the shadows of slides - even well exposed
> ones. I've
> tried Vuescan which has helped lots but still not good enough. Is the
> 4000dpi Canon (or similar) any better? I can't justify an
> Imacon as I'll
> probably get hold of a Canon EOS 1Ds in about a years time.
>
> Regards
>
> Anthony
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------
> Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with
> 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
> or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the
> message title or body
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body