ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2K? Does is manage color like W98SE?



I run 3 PC at home and 3 at work, all using W2k. I will never go back. The 
machines are from Pentium 166MMX (overclocked to 200), through Celeron 300 
(466) to PIII 800, work various PII and PIII around 400 mark. Memory - the 
most important think, get as much as you can squeeze. Mine are at least 128 
MB, up to 512. Bus speed is irrelevant. In Sydney memory PC133/PC100 is 
below AUD100 for 128 MB stick, and AUD170 for 256 stick. At least it was 
last Sunday. The only reason for a dual boot is lack of drivers for w2k.



At 16:10 7/03/2001 -0800, you wrote:


>IronWorks wrote:
>
>>Is a PC100 chip sufficient for Win2K?  Microsoft's site recommends the PC133
>>minimum.
>>Another possibility for some might be a dual boot system with 98SE and also
>>2K.
>>Maris
>
>Does Win 2K require a 133mHz motherboard bus?  Can WIN 2K run on a Celeron 
>system CPU which uses a 66mHz bus?
>
>Art




"Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow 
in Australia".




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.