ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: X rays was Digital PIC




One other reference from Kodak:

  It is therefore possible for films to be significantly fogged by
repeated exposures of less than 1 milliroentgen each but totaling 5
milliroentgens or higher. So when you travel within the United States,
requests for visual inspections should be unnecessary -- unless more than
five inspections are encountered with the same film or when you carry
very high-speed films. If you carry any very high-speed films, request a
visual inspection. In general, it is a good idea to avoid repeated
exposure of your film to x-rays.

=====

I don't know if this paragraph actually makes sense or not.  They state
five exposures of under 1 milliroentgen can lead to a total of 5
milliroentgens or higher...  I don't know how X-rays are measured
cumulatively, so I'm not sure if this is possible the way they explain
it, or not.

Art



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.